{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-08-19\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not\n\u003e on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is.\n\nDespite my complaining about github, I don't like the idea of moving\nsomewhere else. The current way of working - to use github for storing\nthe tree, and use a custom script for signing+merging - is fine with\nme.\n\nGithub has a low barrier to contribution. Almost every open source\ndeveloper already has a github account. Switching to something\nself-hosted makes it more difficult for people to contribute.\n\nPlus if we have to take the hosting upon ourselves, we have to handle\nsysadmin work ourselves as well. That's not a good use of the limited\nmanpower available.\n\nAlso it will be a lot of work to migrate over all the current issues\nand pulls. I don't look forward to that. I don't see the point of\nthis, sorry.\n\nWladimir"}