{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1ae27kq6z802dkqw4ey4dgdx493szm8dpmcm76d7vt0ma9gf6fj4svz5t04","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1ae27kq6z802dkqw4ey4dgdx493szm8dpmcm76d7vt0ma9gf6fj4svz5t04","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-09-02\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:09:36AM -0400, Erik Aronesty wrote:\n\u003e Note:\n\u003e \n\u003e This spec cannot be used directly with a shamir scheme to produce\n\u003e single-round threshold multisigs, because shares of point R would need to\n\u003e be broadcast to share participants in order to produce valid single\n\u003e signatures.\n\u003e \n\u003e (R, s) schemes can still be used \"online\", if share participants publish\n\u003e the R(share).... but, not sure if it matter much, this choice eliminates\n\u003e offline multiparty signing in exchange for batch validation.\n\u003e\n\nPlease stop with this FUD. No tradeoff was made. There are no non-interactive\nSchnorr signatures.\n\n\nAndrew\n \n\n-- \nAndrew Poelstra\nMathematics Department, Blockstream\nEmail: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net\nWeb:   https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew\n\n\"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese\n who can never find their peace,\n whether north or south or west or east\"\n       --Joanna Newsom\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180903/cec88ce8/attachment-0001.sig\u003e"}