{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-09-27\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:26:12PM -0400, jl2012 at xbt.hk wrote:\n\u003e +1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree\n\u003e with all Peter's points.\n\nThanks!\n\n\u003e By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the\n\u003e deployment of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and\n\u003e that's why we have 0.9.5.\n\nI certainly could, though there's good reasons to move to v0.10.x; I'd\nwant to first hear from miners as to why they're still on v0.9.x\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000f8ed62397b82b10e56b9aea309fb18c37985d1405808c4f\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150927/c633be3b/attachment.sig\u003e"}