{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e These are the people who used to run around saying that Bitcoin\n\u003e development is \"decentralized\" because anyone can fork the code and now\n\u003e many of the same people claim a fork will destroy everything.\n\n\nYou may be misremembering; nobody has ever disagreed that you can fork a\nsource code repository. Perhaps you are thinking instead about the concerns\nregarding \"asymmetric\" rule incompatibilities?\n\n- Bryan\nhttp://heybryan.org/\n1 512 203 0507\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150815/7385744d/attachment-0001.html\u003e"}