{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-01-19\n📝 Original message:Correct.  I should have said \"more likely to be deterministic\"  Bitcoin\nCore does not *rely* on determinism in BIP70; I was referring to recent\nupstream efforts to make protobufs usable in a deterministic fashion by\ndefault.\n\nOn Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alan Reiner \u003cetotheipi at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e  I'm a bit confused.  It's been a long time since I looked at protobuf\n\u003e (and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall it doesn't have\n\u003e any of the determinism properties you guys just said.  It is intended to\n\u003e allow you to skip details of the on-the-wire representations and just send\n\u003e a bunch of named fields between systems.  I thought there was no guarantee\n\u003e that two identical protobuf structures will get serialized identically...?\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e   Thanks guys, great answers.\n\u003e\n\u003e  The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of\n\u003e whether one agrees with it or not.\n\u003e\n\u003e  Regards,\n\u003e Richard\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing listBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150119/5f969ba7/attachment.html\u003e"}