{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:Cut it out with the ad hominem attacks please. If you cant be civil, please\ngo away until you learn some manners.\n\nI think the issue being discussed is do you orphan an entire block causing\ndistress to users as well, or try to just cause distress just to the evil\nminer? This discussion is about exploring the ramifications of all these\noptions.\n\nI think you are also forgetting that, miners can implement their own\nfilters and behaviours without anyone's consent. So having an open\ndiscussion and exploring all possibilities can only be a good thing before\nsomeone goes off an implements a change without taking into account other\npoints of view they may not have considered yet.\n On 23 Apr 2014 19:51, \"Justus Ranvier\" \u003cjustusranvier at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n\u003e Hash: SHA1\n\u003e\n\u003e On 04/23/2014 06:37 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e \u003e If you want to try and argue that the development list is the wrong\n\u003e \u003e place to discuss development, please do so on another thread (or\n\u003e \u003e your blog). Let's keep this thread for discussion of the original\n\u003e \u003e proposal - ideally, discussed with the dryness that a topic as\n\u003e \u003e nerdy as distributed consensus algorithms deserves ;)\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Is that what you say to yourself to quiet your conscience at night\n\u003e (assuming you're one of the non-sociopathic humans who does indeed\n\u003e have one)? It's \"just a nerdy distributed consensus problem\"?\n\u003e\n\u003e The things you're talking about fucking around with have real life\n\u003e implications for quite a few people and your casual dismissal of this\n\u003e is precisely why I responded in the way that I did.\n\u003e\n\u003e What you're doing is reckless endangerment and you're not got to get\n\u003e away with brushing it off as a mere technical detail.\n\u003e\n\u003e Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and this episode is demonstrating\n\u003e to the world exactly how averse you are do that kind of transparency.\n\u003e\n\u003e - --\n\u003e Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.\n\u003e Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\n\u003e Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\u003e\n\u003e iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWAsmAAoJECoisBQbQ4v0XTcIAL70+EAkSMUgvGeTN+mROkkd\n\u003e 3ap5NhUYehfW33gEEEyO3a6ofrb6k1a8EbHlzDyq7qPZ925kdvbnwqXDQm7auAh1\n\u003e V8IPAwp+JfCgVDVAxtHuUBUvTuuCn1Mrxnf6ppwzFywBxU6l6KYK9zac1HoX3EVY\n\u003e QxME15zrBmtJfo9/ed9yWz8ZXl6nsx47D3r0VE8FiENJRgxLfZ7Odsr/sGvgL71N\n\u003e aYPv7vMxRBNXDvrMhEuYKa3L83W5kv4JJxzueUyO/0bww/aaeZMZr850u/hUjMgU\n\u003e ui37M+kiFHug3semWGKs1yJiKsEPsEPaU4j6WSDrd0bNbc73bBjvHm9SGYRHzDQ=\n\u003e =L5nX\n\u003e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform\n\u003e Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software\n\u003e Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready\n\u003e Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/1fa69efc/attachment.html\u003e"}