{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"kysela_prdel (npub1lx…fml38)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1lx22azckyh2elpxqptjdld84uksyzu2w9vnf4gvwmsr4jr8sqxwq9fml38","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"I’m almost on the BIP 110 side. The only thing that worries me is this: I’m concerned that after tightening the OP_RETURN rules and other anti-spam measures, spammers will start bloating the UTXO set instead. That would be a worse outcome for node operators, since the UTXO set consumes RAM rather than SSD/HDD storage.\n\nYes, I’ve heard Bitcoin Mechanic argue that this is only a theoretical concern and may never actually happen. But Bitcoin is still the best chain with the brightest future, so the incentive for spammers is significant.\n\nWhat’s your take on this?"}