{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-11-02\n📝 Original message:\nGood morning Rusty, aj, and list,\n\n\n\n\u003e \u003e -   channel announcements: do you support secp256k1 for hashes or just\n\u003e \u003e     sha256?\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Worse, it becomes \"I support secp256k1 with ECDSA\" then a new \"I support\n\u003e secp256k1 with Schnorr\". You need a continuous path of channels with\n\u003e the same feature.\n\u003e\n\nI believe not?  Both the 2p-ECDSA and Schnorr contingent payment schemes effectively encode \"I will pay you N satoshi if you give me the private key of the public key P on the secp256k1 curve, before time B\", which can be composed with another contingent payment of either 2p-ECDSA or Schnorr.  So it would be possible to have a route with channels alternating between the two schemes.\n\nOr do I misunderstand some detail?\n\nRegards,\nZmnSCPxj"}