{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1pa6l5jatv92d4vzk566r58zjawpuu0we8nhrywfhp90f9948e0tsx3rxtp","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1pa6l5jatv92d4vzk566r58zjawpuu0we8nhrywfhp90f9948e0tsx3rxtp","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-04\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e  My view on this is mainly about the UX and the fact everyone in\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoinland has a wallet.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Well, yes, but we also have browsers too :)\n\u003e\n\u003e\nYes, but no one will ever install a plug in.\nAnd all will update their wallets with the last version, including the auth\nprotocol.\n\n\n\u003e I don't want to suggest the problem is unimportant - I'd love it if the\n\u003e world could move beyond passwords. But I have many scars from my time in\n\u003e the Google account swamps. We had a big team, lots of resources and even\n\u003e just getting people to use their phone as a second factor - *the simplest\n\u003e second factor possible* - was a huge uphill battle that most users just\n\u003e didn't care about. People like passwords. If you can find a way to make\n\u003e something that's better than a password but just as convenient, fantastic!\n\u003e But I don't think Bitcoin addresses are such a thing.\n\u003e\n\nI perfectly understand all the objections, and they are very good points.\n\nI have at least two wallets enthousiastic about the project so the protocol\nwill be implemented and it will give some room to experiment.\nThe BIP came from the idea we should formalize the standard so all wallets\ncould participate, and it felt more logical to come forward with it.\n\nMaybe a better strategy would be to start \"privately\" with a few wallets\nand services using the protocol, and to come back to the BIP there is\nusability and traction.\n\nEric\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140404/c8740919/attachment.html\u003e"}