{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1jjaydndmznp5g07v9cf83dq6667rdgk4j52f662qv5k6klsky53sruchtw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1jjaydndmznp5g07v9cf83dq6667rdgk4j52f662qv5k6klsky53sruchtw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-12-09\n📝 Original message:On 12/08/2015 10:12 AM, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Why segwitness as a soft fork? Stuffing the segwitness merkle tree in\n\u003e the coinbase is messy and will just complicate consensus-critical code\n\u003e (as opposed to making the right side of the merkle tree in\n\u003e block.version=5 blocks the segwitness data).\nAgreed. I thought the rule was no contentious hark forks. It seems\nhardly anyone opposes this change and there seems to be widespread\nagreement that the hardfork version would be much cleaner."}