{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08\n📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 21:01, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:51:07 PM Drak wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects\n\u003e \u003e (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can\n\u003e \u003e be trusted so far.\n\u003e\n\u003e Can someone explain how Sirius has proven the least bit untrustworthy?\n\n\nIt's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he\nbecomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup\nand run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew\nregistration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person.\nThat's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the\nsoftware project at sf,github.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/232210d7/attachment.html\u003e"}