{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-09-11\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:20 PM Erik Aronesty \u003cerik at q32.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e The security advantages of a redistributable threshold system are huge.   If a system isn't redistributable, then a single lost or compromised key results in lost coins... meaning the system is essetntially unusable.\n\u003e\n\u003e I'm actually worried that Bitcoin releases a multisig that encourages loss.\n\nThere is no \"non- edistributiable multisig\" proposed for Bitcoin\nanywhere that I am aware of."}
