{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-02\n📝 Original message:On 2 March 2014 20:40, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I proof-read rc1 and simply submitted my changes via pull-req:\n\u003e\n\u003e     https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3642\n\u003e\n\u003e I'd say to encourage that method. If someone doesn't know how to use\n\u003e git, yet still wants to proof-read, just send us a text-file with all\n\u003e your corrections applied. We've got the tools to diff those changes\n\u003e ourselves; no fancy software is required.\n\n\nActually, this is unnecessary since github allows editing of files directly\non the site and the it will submit as a pull request. You can even update\nby visiting your fork (it creates this automatically and a topic branch)\nand make more edits and it will add to your PR. There is basically no\nbarrier for non techy people to contribute.\n\nDrak\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140302/3e12d3e3/attachment.html\u003e"}