{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-05-29\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e And looking at the version (aka user-agent) strings of publicly reachable\n\u003e nodes on the network.\n\u003e (e.g. see the count at  https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/ )\n\u003e\n\nYeah, though FYI Luke informed me last week that I somehow managed to take\nout the change to the user-agent string in Bitcoin XT, presumably I made a\nmistake during a rebase of the rebranding change. So the actual number of\nXT nodes is a bit higher than counting user-agent strings would suggest.\n\nI sort of neglected XT lately. If we go ahead with this then I'll fix\nthings like this.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150529/83bc21bf/attachment.html\u003e"}