{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-11\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Drak \u003cdrak at zikula.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I very much like the idea of assuming each party uses HD wallets, that\n\u003e \u003e certainly simplifies things greatly.\n\u003e\n\u003e It also assumes a reality different from our current one.\n\u003e\n\nMultisig wallets are a different reality from our current one, so when we\nmove to that new reality we should do it correctly from the beginning.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andrese\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140311/b7b38273/attachment.html\u003e"}