{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-07-28\n📝 Original message:That's not what I said. We don't seem able to communicate with each other\nefficiently, probably my fault since English is not my native language. But\nI don't want to use more of my time (or yours) in this discussion, since\nit's clearly unproductive.\nOn Jul 28, 2015 6:45 PM, \"Tom Harding\" \u003ctomh at thinlink.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Jorge,\n\u003e\n\u003e We obviously disagree fundamentally on the role of societal adoption, in\n\u003e the system that Satoshi designed.\n\u003e\n\u003e Adoption is well ahead of Satoshi's schedule, and the measure of this is\n\u003e the exchange rate.  It is at once an imperfect measure, and one of the most\n\u003e perfect markets that has ever existed.\n\u003e\n\u003e As long as hardware, electric power, and bandwidth are priced in fiat\n\u003e currency, the exchange rate is a critical variable to security, capacity,\n\u003e and other metrics of network health.\n\u003e\n\u003e It's not inconsistent that you consider the exchange rate irrelevant.  In\n\u003e fact it explains why you believe that Satoshi's timetable for transitioning\n\u003e to fee incentives can be summarily tossed aside and replaced with something\n\u003e you think is better.\n\u003e\n\u003e Here's an English saying I just invented.  A bunch of geniuses can do a\n\u003e lot more damage than one fool.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150728/c22de55e/attachment.html\u003e"}