{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"moonsettler (npub1dg…4mccn)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1dgesr3zcgyjv2z0050h7auzdlf88gycry7tlk7wsypmgngy97yxqv4mccn","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"obviously there are levels of trust in every interaction yadda yadda... the important distinction is will the protocol be actually constrained by the on-chain supply or not?\n\ncredit networks with ecash mints will not be in any way constrained by what is going on on-chain. credit ecash spent via lightning is absolutely constrained by what exists on-chain.\n\nArk and other covenant pool constructs and rollups can not double pledge sats, every satoshi is expressed on-chain. and i know for a fact there is an easy magnitude of scaling there. with a level of trust (it's not completely trustless) but no perverse incentives and no capability to issue paper bitcoin IOUs.\n\ntrust is not inherently evil, but fall-back on settlment without trust and unilateral exit capability are necessary, not optional."}