{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-21\n📝 Original message:According to Bernstein it's patent FUD (expired, ancient and solid prior\nart).\n\nhttp://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-August/005126.html\n\nAdam\n\nOn Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33:57PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e   Oh, one other reason I found - apparently RIM, at least in the past,\n\u003e   has been telling CA's that they need to pay mad bux for the Certicom\n\u003e   ECC patents. So that's another reason why most certs are still using\n\u003e   RSA."}