{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA512\n\n\n\nOn 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak \u003cbtcdrak at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003eOn Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat\n\u003emodels are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the\n\u003eblocksize.\n\u003e\n\u003eThat's exactly what the \"Technical Opinion\" column is for.\n\nWhat if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\niQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG\nAAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH\nQ4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD\nseN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl\nCLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6\nJKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ\nza9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=\n=Jfl+\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}