{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-04-09\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Justus Ranvier \u003cjustusranvier at gmail.com\u003ewrote:\n\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n\u003e Hash: SHA1\n\u003e\n\u003e On 04/09/2014 06:19 PM, Wladimir wrote:\n\u003e \u003e If no one wants to volunteer resources to support the network\n\u003e \u003e anymore, we'll have failed.\n\u003e\n\u003e If the security of the network depends on a broken incentive model,\n\u003e then fix the design of the network so that economics works for you\n\u003e instead of against you.\n\u003e\n\nMy solution would be quick to implement and could help increase the number\nof nodes in the short term. It will also smooth the way towards splitting\noff the wallet from Bitcoin Core, by giving people a choice what wallet\nthey use with their full node.\n\nThat doesn't preclude looking for longer-term solutions that change the\nincentive structure, but that is much more difficult and risky. I don't\nbelieve it's a matter of 'fixing that instead' in a few hours, though I\nnevertheless look forward to your pull request.\n\nWladimir\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140409/b71b8fa0/attachment.html\u003e"}