{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-11-26\n📝 Original message:On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:32:46 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e Obviously the state of the world with browsers is not that good... but\n\u003e in our own UAs we can do better and get closer to that.\n\nThis effectively centralizes Bitcoin (at least in the eyes of many) and even \nif each competing client had their own list, you'd be back to the original \n\"problem\" of not being sure your CA is on all lists.\n\n\u003e Would you find it acceptable if something supported a static whitelist\n\u003e plus a OS provided list minus a user configured blacklist and the\n\u003e ability for sophisticated users to disable the whitelist?\n\nHow is this whitelist any different from the list of CAs included by default \nwith every OS?"}