{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2016-06-23\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:30:45PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e On Jun 23, 2016 12:56, \"Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e In any case, I'd strongly argue that we remove BIP75 from the bips\n\u003e repository,\n\u003e \u003e and boycott wallets that implement it. It's bad strategy for Bitcoin\n\u003e developers\n\u003e \u003e to willingly participate in AML/KYC, just the same way as it's bad for\n\u003e Tor to\n\u003e \u003e add wiretapping functionality, and W3C to support DRM tech. The minor\n\u003e tactical\n\u003e \u003e wins you'll get our of this aren't worth it.\n\u003e \n\u003e I hope you're not seriously suggesting to censor a BIP because you feel it\n\u003e is a bad idea.\n\nFor the record, I think the idea of the bips repo being a pure publication\nplatform isn't a good one and doesn't match reality; like it or not by\naccepting bips we're putting a stamp of some kind of approval on them.\n\nFor example, I suspect I wouldn't be able to get a BIP for a decentralized\nassassination market protocol standard into the repository, regardless of\nwhether or not it was used - it's simply too distastful and controversial for\nus to want to merge that. Would you call that rejection censorship?\n\nI have zero issues with us exercising editorial control over what's in the bips\nrepo; us doing so doesn't in any way prevent other's from publishing elsewhere.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160623/6fce728d/attachment.sig\u003e"}