{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-07-18\n📝 Original message:Hi all,\n\nI've sent a pull request to make a small change to BIP 62 (my\nanti-malleability proposal) which is still a draft; see:\n* https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/90 (the request)\n* https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip62up/bip-0062.mediawiki (the result)\n\nIt makes two of the 7 new rules mandatory in new blocks, even for\nold-style transactions. Both are already non-standard since 0.8.0, and\nhave no use cases in my opinion.\n\nThe reason for this change is dropping the requirement for signature\nverification engines to be bug-for-bug compatible with OpenSSL (which\nsupports many non-standard encodings for signatures). Requiring strict\nDER compliance for signatures means any implementation just needs to\nsupport DER.\n\nComments?\n\n-- \nPieter"}