{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95j","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95j","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e \"static address\" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended\n\u003e use/direction.\n\n...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?\n\nMore seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from\nthe phrase \"static address\".  But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter\nthan \"address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated\". :-)\n\n-roy"}