{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5t","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5t","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12\n📝 Original message:\u003e To remain useful as border router, the replace-by-fee patched core should\n\u003e only relay double spend if it actually replaces an earlier transaction, as\n\u003e otherwise the replace logic that is according to your commit more than just\n\u003e fee comparison, would have to be replicated in the proprietary stack and\n\u003e mempool might get out of sync with that of the border router.\n\u003e\n\nWhy don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/d898c0e1/attachment.html\u003e"}