{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07\n📝 Original message:On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e That's why I conclude the opposite - if there is no fork, then people's\n\u003e confidence in Bitcoin will be seriously damaged.\n\u003e\n\nYes, that is a possibility.\n\n\n\n\u003e If it's impossible to do something as trivial as removing a temporary hack\n\u003e Satoshi put in place, then what about bigger challenges?\n\u003e\n\nThis is absolutely not a trivial change.\n\nIt is a trivial *code* change.  It is not a trivial change to the economics\nof a $3.2B system.\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/9ef5c02d/attachment.html\u003e"}