{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-06-14\n📝 Original message:Bitcoin Knots still uses this service bit, FWIW (though due to a bug in some \nolder versions, it wasn't signalled by default). There are probably at least \n100 nodes with full RBF already.\n\nOn Wednesday 15 June 2022 02:27:20 Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 08:25:11PM -0400, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev \nwrote:\n\u003e \u003e If you're a node operator curious to play with full-rbf, feel free to\n\u003e \u003e connect to this node or spawn up a toy, public node yourself. There is a\n\u003e \u003e ##uafrbf libera chat if you would like information on the settings or\n\u003e \u003e looking for full-rbf friends (though that step could be automated in the\n\u003e \u003e future by setting up a dedicated network bit and reserving a few outbound\n\u003e \u003e slots for them).\n\u003e\n\u003e I previously maintained a Bitcoin Core fork that did just that, using\n\u003e nServices bit 26:\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/commit/1cc1a46a633535c42394380b656d681\n\u003e258a111ac\n\u003e\n\u003e IIRC I was using the code written to prefer segwit peers; I have no idea if\n\u003e a similar approach is still easy to implement as I haven't worked on the\n\u003e Bitcoin Core codebase for years."}