{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Oct 5, 2015 2:08 PM, \"Clément Elbaz\" \u003cclem.ds at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e It will get correct results about :\n\u003e - the existence every block\n\u003e - the existence of every transaction\n\u003e\n\u003e It will get incorrect results :\n\u003e - about the nature of some transactions\n\nGiven the assumptions above, only of transactions without enough\nconfirmations.\n\n\u003e - and therefore, about the balances of some wallets.\n\nNot if the wallet waits for enough confirmations.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/51a36627/attachment.html\u003e"}