{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1j7cm657crpk3y4jkvm7hk0le3c8c4x8yuqflk5dvzuyxn8k845lsfvmlg6","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1j7cm657crpk3y4jkvm7hk0le3c8c4x8yuqflk5dvzuyxn8k845lsfvmlg6","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2016-03-02\n📝 Original message:\u003e BtcDrak tells me he has well-tested code for this in his altcoin\nCould you be more explicit, which altcoin is that?\n\n\u003e I am unaware of any reason this would be controversial\nProbably not until you get to the details of any proposal. What is\nyour exact proposal here? Algorithm? Parameters?\nAs you likely know a too short time window would be dangerous for\nother reasons. Getting to an agreement as to what is reasonable or not\nis not necessarily trivial.\n\nJeremie\n\n\n2016-03-02 16:14 GMT+01:00 Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e:\n\u003e On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:05:08 PM Pavel Janík wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e the network. This would result in a significantly longer block interval,\n\u003e\u003e \u003e which also means a higher per-block transaction volume, which could\n\u003e\u003e \u003e cause the block size limit to legitimately be hit much sooner than\n\u003e\u003e \u003e expected.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e If this happens at all (the exchange rate of the coin can accomodate such\n\u003e\u003e expectation),\n\u003e\n\u003e The exchange rate is not significantly influenced by these things.\n\u003e Historically, it seems fairly obvious that the difficulty has followed value,\n\u003e not value following difficulty.\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e the local fee market will develop, fees will raise and complement mined\n\u003e\u003e coins, thus bringing more miners back to the game (together with expected\n\u003e\u003e higher exchange rate).\n\u003e\n\u003e Depends on the hashrate drop, and tolerance for higher fees, both of which are\n\u003e largely unknown at this time. At least having code prepared for the negative\n\u003e scenarios in case of an emergency seems reasonable, even if we don't end up\n\u003e needing to deploy it.\n\u003e\n\u003e Luke\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev"}