{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub15wz8j5cse6sexlw6f5q7arc5efe5hxn6kcxxyy222et8qms4u3lsemaru8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub15wz8j5cse6sexlw6f5q7arc5efe5hxn6kcxxyy222et8qms4u3lsemaru8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nI suggest revising these items for clarity (and I'm guessing on the first\none)\n\n    Calculate hardLimit by examining the coinbase scriptSig votes of the\nprevious 12,000 blocks, and taking the 20th percentile.\n    A new hardLimit may not increase or decrease by more than 1.2x beyond\nthe prior hardLimit.\n\nto:\n\n    The new hardLimit is calculated by sorting the coinbase scriptSig votes\nof the last 12,000 blocks from lowest to highest and using the vote of the\n2400th block.\n    If the vote of the 2400th block is a change of less than 20%, use it as\nthe new hardLimit.  Otherwise, change the hardLimit to be closer to that\nvote, to either 120% or 80% of the current hardLimit.\n\nI don't understand #5, 75% rule.  Shouldn't invalid version 4 blocks always\nbe rejected?\n\nnotplato\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v2\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV58/5AAoJEL8dSijmIbHt16IH/0jAr3v1HjWW7N1awNxeAABs\nGIvOFYuZAcPkZvWZQc4JRAppglqeBfYqWl2gpyywSBK1SXjsY8zdo3t7xAK/IJfB\n05hnv1GGutG3dLTzJBEXaPx62SLukepC1pzEH7rlwWvVuE9zcRqVE1eGbBEUjA9c\nsGPr0z9BNeLoTbllyl3Jndz9N2Vnd6bBTxRgBlfkm/Y5ovc+GhyKZyX3Pdmj5Pga\nE6foOsvqNXQJqPl8WCODsnfPSshyb7YRNFrBB9A+tpjvj4UMc8PxOpL6IX/nJpOt\njlfRoKVw2YBEodvda+9P6S54GlGFazyHhwJ11F5YCNnWW1bKoQrqJU6ofgmyxMM=\n=QWra\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\n\nOn Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e BIP 100 initial public draft:\n\u003e https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki\n\u003e\n\u003e Emphasis on \"initial\"  This is a starting point for the usual open source\n\u003e feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nI like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a\ntechie?\nI own Litmocracy \u003chttp://www.litmocracy.com\u003e and Meme Racing\n\u003chttp://www.memeracing.net\u003e (in alpha).\nI'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist \u003chttp://www.voluntaryist.com\u003e which\nnow accepts Bitcoin.\nI also code for The Dollar Vigilante \u003chttp://dollarvigilante.com/\u003e.\n\"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules\" - Satoshi\nNakamoto\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150902/f858063b/attachment.html\u003e"}