{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nOn 01/15/2014 04:05 PM, Jeremy Spilman wrote:\n\u003e Might I propose \"reusable address\".\n\nSay it like it is. This is the only suggestion so far that I really like.\n\nNo amount of finger wagging got people to stop using the block chain\nfor data storage, but news of the OP_RETURN change to relay rules in\n0.9 got people to at least be less damaging in how they do it.\n\nHaving an officially named \"reusable address\" format won't stop people\nfrom doing dumb things (e.g. vanity addresses), but at least maybe\nthey'll stop using traditional addresses for it.\n\nMark\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n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\nqrFg7irL2+CxXwI4H6vC\n=XEtz\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}