{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-02-12\n📝 Original message:On 02/12/2014 08:44 AM, Alan Reiner wrote:\n\u003e Changing the protocol to use these static IDs is a pretty fundamental\n\u003e change that would never happen in Bitcoin.   But they can still be\n\u003e useful at the application level to mitigate these issues.\n\nNot to mention that it would be potentially very insecure to have\nconsensus depend on data (scriptSigs) which are not hashed in the Merkle\nstructure of a block.\n\nNot that anyone on this list has suggested such a change, but I've seen\nit raised multiple times on the forum....\n\nMark"}
