{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-12-20\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 07:43:59PM -0800, Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Then shouldn't this be something the pool deals with, not the bitcoin protocol?\n\nThere is no known way for pools - especially ones that allow anonymous\nhashers - to effectively prevent block withholding attacks without\nchanging the Bitcoin protocol.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151219/f7fbf6c9/attachment.sig\u003e"}