{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-07-12\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e  we can expect mining to transition to a public service from the current\n\u003e for-profit business model\n\u003e\n\nI get it now\n\nGame theory would predict all of the major players mining in the future\nwill be large holders\n\nIf you're holding a hundred Bitcoin you should take one, sell it for mining\nequipment and use it  to ensure the rest is stable\n\nI guess that's perfectly reasonable\n\nYeah I'm on board with the idea that this is a non-issue\n\nInterested parties will continue to maintain the security of the chain with\nthe same basic game theoretic stuff\n\nBitcoin doesn't need a security budget\n\nExisting holders have the ability the means and the incentive to secure\ntheir funds\n\nProbably the only thing Bitcoiners should do is to advertise this rather\nthan to make it some sort of secret\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220712/df4c711e/attachment.html\u003e"}