{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1h394c0pkdum0jw4rufslt3ur9m9c2ym4x7a0t68spfpjr6zlq3msu8z4k5","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1h394c0pkdum0jw4rufslt3ur9m9c2ym4x7a0t68spfpjr6zlq3msu8z4k5","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2016-05-09\n📝 Original message:On Monday 09 May 2016 13:40:55 Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e [It's a little disconcerting that you appear to be maintaining a fork\n\u003e \u003e\u003e and are unaware of this.]\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003eehm...\n\u003e \n\u003e Can you please explain why you moved the above part of gmaxwell's reply to\n\u003e here,\n\nA personal attack had no place in the technical discussion, I moved it out.\n\n\n\nInitially I asked him to please avoid personal attacks, but I thought better \nof it and edited my reply to just \"ehm...\".\n\n\nThe moderators failed to catch his aggressive tone while moderating my post \n(see archives) for being too aggressive.\n\nI'm sure this message will also not be allowed through. I would not even blame \nthe moderators since this, and Peters, messages were both off-topic.\n\nI thank you for todays talks, it makes me certain of the thing I said this \nweekend on Reddit that this list is not a suitable place for all the different \nstakeholders to talk on a level playing field.\n\nIf any of you agree, please urge the approach that we replace the entire \nmoderation team with a new one. This will be the least painful solution for \neveryone in the ecosystem.\n\nThanks again."}