{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e To be honest, I have not carried out a comprehensive examination of\n\u003e server performance. What I can see is that Electrum servers are often\n\u003e slowed down when a wallet with a large number (thousands) of addresses\n\u003e shows up, and this is caused by disk seeks (especially on my slow VPS).\n\u003e\n\nYes that sounds more like what I expected.\n\n\n\u003e In terms of bandwidth, I am referring to my Android version of Electrum.\n\u003e When it runs on a 3G connection, it sometimes takes up to 1 minute to\n\u003e synchronize (with a wallet that has hundreds of addresses). However, I\n\u003e have not checked if this was caused by addresses or block headers.\n\u003e\n\nAn address is 160 bits. (1000 * 160) / 8 / 1024 = 19.5 kilobytes of data\nwhich 3G should be able to transfer in \u003c1 second easily. Of course the\nencoding may not be optimal. But if it is, I suspect the issue is elsewhere.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140327/70f4cdce/attachment.html\u003e"}