{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07\n📝 Original message:On Friday 7. August 2015 19.33.34 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e When \"the network runs out of capacity\" (when we hit the limit) do we\n\u003e expect anything to happen apart from minimum market fees rising (above\n\u003e zero)?\n\nHow many clients actually evict transactions from their mempool currently? If \nthe backlog grows infinitely (as a result of more in than out), that would be \na problem.\nHow many wallets re-transmit their transaction when your local full nodes \nmempool no longer has it? Problem.\n\nWhat will the backlash be when people here that are pushing for \"off-chain-\ntransactions\" fail to produce a properly working alternative, which \nessentially means we have to say NO to more users. We can't service you, \nsorry. Please go away.\n\nAt this time and this size of bitcoin community, my personal experience (and \nI've been part of many communities) saying NO to new customers will kill the \nproduct totally. Or, if we are lucky, just make an altcoin that quickly \nbecomes the de-facto standard.\n-- \nThomas Zander"}