{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2021-03-06\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 01:11:01PM -0500, Matt Corallo wrote:\n\u003e I'm really unsure that three months is a short enough time window that there\n\u003e wouldn't be a material effort to split the network with divergent consensus\n\u003e rules. \n\nI oppose designing activation mechanisms with the goal of preventing\nother people from effectively exercising self determination over what\nconsensus rules their nodes enforce.\n\nThree months was chosen because it's long enough to give miners a\nreasonable enough amount of time to activate taproot but it's also short\nenough that it doesn't delay any of the existing proposals with roughly\none-year timelines.  As such, I think it has the potential to gain\nacceptance from multiple current factions (even if it doesn't ever gain\ntheir full approval), allowing us to move forward with rough social\nconsensus and to gain useful information from the attempt that can\ninform future decisions.\n\n-Dave\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 833 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210306/69399d40/attachment.sig\u003e"}