{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-24\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e There is no voting in the way you think. Devs commit changes the users\n\u003e will accept and use. Users \"fire\" developers by choosing different devs or\n\u003e different software.\n\n\nI think that statement is too weak. Users are all personally responsible\nfor evaluating all rules for themselves. Many have chosen and will continue\nto choose to just keep an ear out for rule changes that they may be\ninterested in using. Ever user should be educated on this topic...\notherwise there are too many principal agent problems, even with the\nability to \"fire\" developers (a.k.a \"use different software\"). It's similar\nto the reasons why it's important to see all the transactions on the\nnetwork.\n\n- Bryan\nhttp://heybryan.org/\n1 512 203 0507\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150624/92da5acc/attachment.html\u003e"}