{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1wz8zfl8azn6qfnx5t5d479wwnf69keeq4amvsp590nvzrunqumrqurnuay","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1wz8zfl8azn6qfnx5t5d479wwnf69keeq4amvsp590nvzrunqumrqurnuay","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27\n📝 Original message:I wish you were just as prudent when you were recommending full RBF to \nmining pools.\n\nOn 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.\n\n\n-- \nRandi Joseph\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/264e693e/attachment.html\u003e"}