{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub13rv3raner7hu6npy7vxxvdswdapae65pnw8jjs4c80wtp2nmg4xq9cy5l4","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub13rv3raner7hu6npy7vxxvdswdapae65pnw8jjs4c80wtp2nmg4xq9cy5l4","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27\n📝 Original message:That test seems like a reasonable suggestion; 840GB is not prohibitive\ngiven today's computing costs. What other than the successful result of\nthat test would you want to see before agreeing to increase the block size\nto 8MB?\n\n\nOn Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n\u003e Hash: SHA256\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On 27 June 2015 10:39:51 GMT-04:00, Michael Naber \u003cmickeybob at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003eCompromise: Can we agree that raising the block size to a static 8MB\n\u003e \u003enow\n\u003e \u003ewith a plan to increase it further should demand necessitate except in\n\u003e \u003ethe\n\u003e \u003especial case above is a reasonable path forward?\n\u003e\n\u003e It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing\n\u003e done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that\n\u003e appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with\n\u003e two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to\n\u003e test performance characteristics.\n\u003e\n\u003e Of course, that'll be a 840GB download - if that's unreasonable you might\n\u003e want to ask why 8MB blocks are reasonable...\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e\n\u003e iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVjr9n\n\u003e AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAIIwu4maaJs4pAKpK00jQnhPNIQ8LPvijD/8vvyugA1z\n\u003e OLxlRrn8zs7JPFbxWOAzK2qzT1RksSd0gbXqWm/Saqk9CAG5LBp7Oq0HAVE23XYt\n\u003e 6BvyhjyhYaZjDrv+SZvlSjdl5xfpDNPMIXMi7XblKD9hm1GIUSVIYAOinOSVIy0B\n\u003e HlKyn/xc4MaO8DuzQcs0vsNMudVQFLMOLjMWz/7iv41NnB/Ujjzv/6845Z1g7Opf\n\u003e d5AfxhPHZixshqav/lF7ly7xQwSZZpoJCyFdtzCNG47EQmFYY9e22uy1KVzS7Zeo\n\u003e qYPi3KRx5+vFtHHJMDYG5EIMTwI4l/4+lY/Sd0CFWss=\n\u003e =0IOS\n\u003e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/405bf6a8/attachment.html\u003e"}