{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-06\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e if some sort of Stealth address or HD wallet root was the identity gaining\n\u003e the reputation, then address re-use wouldn't have to be mandatory.\n\u003e\nThe identity would be the X.520 name in the signing cert that signed the\npayment request. It doesn't have to be a difficult to obtain cert. It could\neven be self signed for this use case, but then you lose the security\nbenefits and a key rotation would delete your reputation, so in practice I\nthink most people would want the reputation to accrue to the name itself.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140306/862d156e/attachment.html\u003e"}