{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-10-29\n📝 Original message:Thanks for the feedback, everybody, gist updated:\n  https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034\n\nCategories are:\n\n0x01-0x0fProtocol syntax errors0x10-0x1fProtocol semantic errors0x40-0x4fServer\npolicy rule\n\u003chttps://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034#rejection-codes-common-to-all-message-types\u003e\n\nRE: why not a varint:  because we're never ever going to run out of reject\ncodes.  Eight are defined right now, if we ever defined eight more I'd be\nsurprised.\n\nRE: why not use HTTP codes directly: because we'd be fitting round pegs\ninto square holes.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131029/606c3950/attachment.html\u003e"}