{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-05-02\n📝 Original message:On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp \u003cgrarpamp at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Try \"Reply to All\"\n\u003e\n\u003e That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',\n\u003e which dupes to the sender and eventually\n\u003e blows out the to and cc lines as everyone\n\u003e chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves\n\u003e most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.\n\n\"Reply-To\" Munging Considered Harmful\nhttp://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html\n\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nexMULTI, Inc.\njgarzik at exmulti.com"}