{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Btc Drak \u003cbtcdrak at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Additionally, correct me if I am wrong, but the net effect from preventing\n\u003e fees rising from zero would be to guarantee miners have no alternative\n\u003e income from fees as block subsidy dries up and thus harm the incentives to\n\u003e secure the chain.\n\nI don't think that's necessarily true. Theoretically urgent\ntransactions could fund hashing power on their own while there are\nstill some free non-urgent transactions being mined from time to time."}