{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwy","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub16ycdmhx5sct3h37cwvjff8le7qlp9k0ngst5ry5n262j6gkesrssskjvwy","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-05-08\n📝 Original message:\nIf I'm not mistaken, the scriptless scripts concept (as currently\nformulated) falls to Schor's algorithm, and at present there is no\nalternative implementation of the concept to fall back on. Correct? Lest we\nbuild a house of cards, I'd strongly urge everyone to not depend on\nfunctional concepts whose underlying cryptographic primitives cannot be\nswapped in an emergency.\n\nSure, we use ecdsa for example (which is also vulnerable to Schor's\nalgorithm), but in contrast to scriptless scripts we have a variety of\nbackup primitives at our disposal that fulfill the same functional\nobjective.\n\nIf scriptless scripts are found possible under lattice-based cryptography\nfor example, that would be something I suppose. The functional concept of\nscriptless scripts is indeed very awesome - we just need to add some\ncryptographic conservatism before we build on it.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180508/e565d776/attachment.html\u003e"}