{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ed","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ed","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I also agree with Mike that Core's requirement for unanimous consensus\n\u003e results in development grid lock and should be revisited.\n\u003e\n\nThere is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev; look\nat the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibrant.\nDevelopers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient to\nyour narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground.\n\nPlease desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/4d591b1b/attachment.html\u003e"}