{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-10-25\n📝 Original message:Mike Hearn has been lobbying for an \"error\" message in the Bitcoin p2p\nprotocol for years (at least since the \"ban peers if they send us garbage\"\ndenial-of-service mitigation code was pull-requested). This came up again\nwith my proposed \"smartfee\" changes, which would drop low-priority or\nlow-fee transactions.\n\nIn short, giving peers feedback about why their blocks or transactions are\ndropped or why they are being banned should help interoperability between\ndifferent implementations, and will give SPV (simplified payment\nverification) clients feedback when their transactions are rejected due to\ninsufficient priority or fees.\n\nSee the gist for details, I'm looking for feedback and planning on\nimplementing this before circling back to finish the 'smart fee' work:\n\n   https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/86e9867d/attachment.html\u003e"}