{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Monday 5. October 2015 20.33.04 s7r via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e For example, I don't see this controversial nor a violation of the BIP\n\u003e requirements. Mike had some fair objections, they were explained by\n\u003e gmaxwell and Jorge, everybody understood. The explanation is clear,\n\u003e with plausible practical examples, so from my point of view the\n\u003e objections have no arguments to sustain the claim.\n\nI enjoyed reading them, but I have to admit I'm not convinced and for me the \nobjections stand.\n\nSoftforks are unnecessarily dangerous and I feel entirely avoidable. It is a \nrisk that not worth taking."}