{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9h","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9h","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2016-06-24\n📝 Original message:\u003e Clearly the primary purpose of BIP0075 is to enshrine a DNSSEC protocol\n\u003e for giving wallet addresses memorable names.\n\u003e\n\u003e\nI can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you aren't, I don't\nthink this is an accurate description at all. BIP75 is, at its most\nsimplest, nothing more than an encrypted/encapsulated version of BIP70. All\nwe did was make it safe for people to exchange BIP70 messages through an\nintermediary.\n\nThe only identity information included in BIP75 is the pki_data field,\nwhich wasn't even introduced in BIP75--it was already in BIP70. I'm\nguessing Peter would also have us remove BIP70 altogether?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: PastedGraphic-1.tiff\nType: image/tiff\nSize: 10972 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.tiff\u003e"}